Shalom to all the new readers!
Join the party!
"cast me forth into the sea, so shall the sea be calm unto you"
But of course Lubavitch today is the engine running on the fundraising fuel, moved by the Jewish nostalgia. There is no better person to lubricate this engine than a high profile celebrity like the Professor.
He is calling himself a Misnaged and he forgets his Williamsburg grandfather who was a chosid of the Malach (see comments here to the Reb Shneor Zalman Hakohen Blesovsky, OHS post). But on to the prescribed by the professor kiruv approach that he learned from the Rabeinu Hirschy Zarchi: �don't ask Harvard students to do anything inconsistent with their own secular philosophy, don't conduct any Chabad programs for example that require men and women to sit separately, therefore don't have Shabbat services necessarily, don't have Rosh Hashana and Yom Kippur services�.
Hirschy is a Chabad celebrity chef of Harvard. He runs a kosher soup kitchen for students. The Harvard students are not there to get lectured; they have plenty of that in the school. There are there to chill with the cholnt. I guess davening together on Yom Kippur is not that important in the scheme of things. Professor Dershowitz says it is the way to go.
Meanwhile Schneur Zalman of NY will have to put his dream on hold. The army is coming.
I listened to Rabbi Berl Lazar speech two times. It is a motivational speech. I don�t see how I can hold it against him that the speech was mostly positive, this is what a motivational speech supposed to be. The speech was obviously written by a professional ghost writer, it had a nice flow and balance. It was properly structured and most importantly it was a very sincere speech.
Berl Lazar and Kaminetzky and others went to Russia not expecting the material spoils. The spoils that came their way are only as he said �kelim detikun�. Please spare us listening about Putin�s gefilte fish though. Yet, I don�t even feel like clabbering Lazar for being a court Jew or Oligarch�s pass�. He is trying to do the best under the circumstances. Rabbi Lazar�s heart is in the right place when he offers recognition to the unsung Shaliyah �kol dmimo dako�.
But it is very telling that there was one phrase that Lazar used three or four times - "umil'u es-hooretz vchivshuho" - �fill and concur the land�. This is what Gandalin describes as �fascism-communism-nationalsozialismus� philosophy. I bet you he really sees Shluchim as a concurring army. We did speak about the origins of this thinking in the il Duce of Marina Roscha. This approach already reared it�s head in my past interview:
�Lazar�s general strategy is a complete monopoly and a methodical centralized control. This is his "glavny politichesky vector" (main political vector).�Rabbi Berl Lazar also used the phrase �Toirah uMizvos Galore�, so on to the reality check:

The differences between the Britannick Enlightenment (Scottish in particular) on the one hand and the French Enlightenment on the other hand, are striking and critical to understanding how the continental Enlightenment gave rise to statism in its various avatars of fascism-nationalsozialismus-communism whereas the British Enlightenment, as brought to fruition in America, gave rise to a society which freed its slaves, enfranchised its laborers and women, and twice sent armies to Europe not as conquerors but as liberators.
The existence of the Masonic Lodge as a laboratory in which Godfearing men of differing faith communities could develop the personal habits that permit democracy was undoubtedly important. Democracy is not NO-government, it is SELF-government. The Masonic Lodge provided a dojo in which self-government could be learned, even in a society that was still monarchical and hierarchical.
berl, crown heights: Very illuminating. Can you please elaborate on the 'the differences between the Britannic and French Enlightenment'? Any good book on the subject?
Gandalin: The Britannick Enlightenment as I see it has roots that go back before the actual period of the Enlightenment, at least to Elizabethan Times. The philosophy of Francis Bacon, whose "New Atlantis" may be the remnant of a Masonic or Rosicrucian project to establish a model polity in the Americas, is certainly one precursor.
I find in the Britannic Enlightenment a concern for the individual, an epistemological skepticism, and an anti-utopian reformism, if you will, that seeks to ameliorate the life of mankind while recognizing the complex and problematic in human nature.
In the French "lumieres" I find an utopian perfectionism, clothed in a Rousseauian idyll which conceals the murderous rage that the philosopher-kings will later turn on their subjects, when the people are unable to live up to the ideals that were upheld for them. The absolutism of Saint-Just, the formal and open establishment of The Terror as an instrument of public policy (I believe this is the first appearance of terrorism in the world-historical-political lexicon.)
In order to perceive the difference between them, one need only compare the American Declaration of Independence and Constitution (remarkable for their sobriety and realism) with the perorations of a Babeuf, a Robespierre, or a Marat.
TA: Gandalin, can you suggest a "for dummies" reading list on this?
Gandalin: Here is a suggested reading list for those who may have an interest in the British and Continental Enlightenment(s).
First of all, since you entered this subject by way of Napoleon Bonaparte�s supposed Masonic connections; I am going to suggest an historical work which discusses the possible influence of Freemasonry on continental politics in the XVIIIth century. Most of what is published on this subject is, I fear, nonsense. The Masons who have written on the topic tend, I think, to over-estimate the role played by the Masonic Lodge in the republican Revolutions of the Enlightenment, and the books written by anti-Masons are largely nothing more than conspiratorial fantasies. (As I�m sure you know, the text of the �Protocols of the Elders of Zion� was originally written to �expose� a supposed Masonic plot to conquer the world, before it was re-edited to turn the plot into a Jewish one, and it is equally fictional in that context.)
A scholarly work using sound principles and based on the examination of primary sources is Professor Margaret Jacob�s �Living the Enlightenment,� Oxford University Press, 1991. She shows that Masonry provided a vehicle to transmit throughout the continent, originally British ideas. Politically, these ideas included the notion that men were capable of choosing their own leaders in elections that proceeded by a secret ballot; that a voluntary association could be governed by an explicit constitution, bylaws, and decisions made by elected representatives; that men of different professional backgrounds and social origins could meet and converse as equals (albeit, at first, in a carefully delimited locale, namely the Lodge); and that religious believers from very different faith communities could dedicate themselves to the service of Deity together, and that underlying the different particularistic manifestations of their faith was a shared understanding that Natural Law derives from a benign and omnipotent Creator. Thus was �civil society� created in the midst of the decaying �ancient regime.�
Philosophically, the major figures in the British Enlightenment were, I think, Locke and Hume. The English physician John Locke was a XVIIth century figure whose interests, unlike those of his friend Sydenham, extended well beyond the boundaries of medical science. He wrote the �Essay,� as well as �Treatises� on government and other subjects. The Scotsman David Hume lived during the XVIIIth century, and is best remembered today, I think, for his �Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding.� But the most important thinker in terms of political economy or political philosophy was probably Adam Smith, a professor at Glasgow, who�s �Wealth of Nations� (1776) remains relevant and enlightening today. Another XVIth century philosopher worth reading is Thomas Hobbes, whose skepticism about the state of nature contrasts with Rousseau�s view of the noble savage.
I claim that the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution of the United States are practical documents that embody the philosophy of the British Enlightenment, and a close reading of both would provide an excellent background in key concepts of the British Enlightenment. If you want to delve more deeply into the political ramifications of the enlightenment ideals, then I suggest the Federalist Papers or the Adams-Jefferson correspondence.
As for the continental enlightenment, we should distinguish between the German Aufklaerung, which was largely academic, and the French �lumieres� whose philosophy devolved into the Revolution, the Terror, the Empire, and the various statist doctrines that bedeviled Europe in the XXth century. (Margaret Thatcher has saliently pointed out that neither communism nor nationalsozialismus nor fascism originated in Britain, but that all are manifestations of a continental European tradition or sickness, depending on your point of view. For intellectual histories of socialism, I like Joshua Muravchik�s �Heaven on Earth,� which is especially good on Babeuf and the early German thinkers Lasalle and Bernstein. I also like Shafarevich�s book on Socialism, which in its English translation is now out of print, although you have to take it with a grain of salt. I am aware that Shafarevich has allied himself with anti-Semitic nationalist parties in Russia, and he tends to take the view, mistaken I think, that modern socialism is the direct outgrowth of a long-standing, anti-Christian, heretical conspiracy which he sketches in from Freemasonry backwards through to the radical Anabaptists, the Free Spirit movement of late medieval Northern Europe, and the Cathars. I don�t buy that. However, it is remarkable to see what he could do with the materials that were available to him in the Soviet Union, and his depiction of the early Chin Empire and of the Inca Empire as socialist dystopias is compelling. He does show I think that the socialist idea does not derive from any supposed contradiction between the industrial proletariat and bourgeoisie, but is rather a totalitarian ideal found already in a quite developed form in Plato�s �Republic� and St Thomas More�s �Utopia.�)
Immanuel Kant is the quintessential German Enlightenment writer, but he is quite difficult. Perhaps his pamphlet �Was ist Aufklaerung� would be of interest.
The French Enlightenment authors include Denis Diderot, the paragon of materialism, Voltaire, the Baron de Montesquieu, and of course Rousseau. Rousseau�s essays on the Social Contact, on the Origin of Inequality, and on the Arts and Sciences are relatively straightforward. Diderot expended his life on the Encyclopedie, but his fictional works are of great interest, including the story of Jacques le Fataliste � et son maitre � and the remarkable conversation with �Rameau�s Nephew.� Many of his essays were circulated only in manuscript, but were quite influential when you consider that the subscribers included Catherine the Great and Frederick the Great. Voltaire�s works are better known, and in Voltaire we find the extreme anti-clericalism of the French Enlightenment taking form. Montesquieu�s �De l�esprit des lois� is important, and his �Lettres Persane,� is also quite good. He used a fictional Persian setting to evade royal censorship.
Delving into all that would be quite a start!
This post is truly amazing. Is it possible you actually believe that Chabad chassidus in particular and Yiddishkeit in general are incapable of generating their own authentic spiritual/philosophical development, but merely reflect whatever milieu surrounds them? Is it possible that you still believe the communist malarkey about the class, g-dless, materialistic American culture that you seem to have been fed in the CCCP? Is it possible that you actually believe there is really something of value, ethically and epistemologically, in the Gauloise-smoke-rings of the St Germain des Pres philosophers who are even now looking for the appropriate jihadist uebermenschen to worship, having previously exhausted themselves collaborating with the Nazis, and adoring the communists?
TA: I have no illusions about Foucault�s and his ilk. I am speaking about the values and the values are such that a most successful professor in USA will never be as respected as successful car salesmen (unless the professor managed to turn his title into a business).
Gandalin: I think you have hit on one reason for the infatuation of the Western intelligentsia with fascism-communism-nationalsozialismus -- you are perhaps correct "that a most successful professor in USA will never be as respected as successful car salesmen" -- whereas under the statist tyrannies of the left, the intelligentsia and literati were given academies, medals, jobs, and apartments! Seemingly a much greater role, a more prominent role in social life.
TA: Isn�t the Jewish traditional social structure is in fact a "statist tyranny" based on the French model?
Gandalin: My impression of the traditional Jewish constitution of the Davidic and Hashmonean monarchies, is that there is supposed to have existed, first of all, a parallel system of royal and religious courts, somewhat diluting, I think, the absolute power of the state, and that the monarch was constrained at least to some degree by the public's knowledge of the laws which he (or she, in a case or two) was required also to follow.
I don't doubt, however, that life was less free in those distant times, and that the economy of the country, in particular, was hindered by an absence of understanding of the free market. I do note, however, that reforms such as the prozbul demonstrate, in my opinion, that some of the basic principles of economics were beginning to be understood in the Jewish state of 2,000 years ago.
Moreover, I think that the institution of the Sanhedrin did provide for a form on non-utopian reform in a variety of spheres of thought and activity.
TA: I meant to refer to a more recent history when Jews in Europe have absorbed the legacy of the French, German, Russian absolutist enlightenments. (Even here in America Jews flirted with communism and remain dominantly left leaning towards the French model.) Chasidic Jews on the other hand remain an absolutist society where utopian ideas coexist with violence and rage (Satmar) or institutionalized, centralized, hierarchical, Kafkaesque, cliquish, human engineering (Lubavitch).
And then there is a tapestry of American traditions. Would Mormon tradition be considered an absolutist? And there are "more French" Philadelphia Quakers, "more English" Bostonians, etc. I admit I know almost nothing about this.
Gandalin: Your perceptions are penetrating, and quite on the mark.
You are absolutely right that most American Jews remain enthralled by the failed socio-economic-political statisms of the European left. (They were inoculated from nationalsozialismus only because of its extreme anti-Semitism.) I appreciate your perceptions of the Chassidische welt, but I am too ignorant to comment further on it, and I look forward to more of your observations here.
As far as the tapestry of American traditions is concerned -- for an extremely insightful analysis of the different American regional traditions, I can not too highly recommend "Albion's Seed" by David Hackett Fisher (1985).
He shows that the British peopling of what became the United States proceeded in four very distinct waves of immigration, and that each wave came from a very distinctive British sub-culture, bringing with it very distinct folk traditions in law, religion, food, behavior, etc.
Thus, the first wave (1620-1645) consisted of Puritans from East Anglia. The next, high church cavaliers from Wessex and Sussex who immigrated to the Virginia tidewater (including Maryland) after Cromwell took power (1650-1700).
The Quakers (joined by German priests who shared much of their worship style) came from the northern Midlands and settled in the Delaware valley.
The last wave consisted of much poorer emigrants from the surroundings of the Irish Sea in the border counties, the Scottish lowlands, and Northern Ireland. These "Scots-Irish" settled in the mountains.
The differences between these different groups, in speech, in philosophy, and religion, were already pronounced before they came to America, and their differences remain.
Further immigrants tend to adopt the style and mores of the English sub-culture into which they move. Thus Fisher, who teaches at Brandeis, notes that Jewish students in his classes tend to reflect the predominant subculture in the region where their ancestors settled.
One example: marriage. For the Puritans in the Massachusetts Bay Colony, a marriage was a civil contract and was NOT celebrated in a Church. The betrothal was announced in Church, but the wedding was purely civil affair, conducted at home, and solemnized by civil rather than religious officials. For the cavaliers of tidewater Virginia on the other hand, a marriage was a sacrament, to be celebrated with nuptials in a formal, consecrating Church service.
It is thus no wonder, is it, that Massachusetts should formalize homosexual marriages, and that Virginia should find such a move entirely scandalous.
TA: And where that leaves California?
So how did 9 (some say 11) year old Milton come up with the name Googol? Edward Kasner in a footnote in Mathematics and the Imagination wrote that "googol" is "not even approximately a Russian author Nikolai Gogol".
There is a WSJ artcile on the subject, it reports that "it's unclear how the words popped into young Milton's head. Caroline Birenbaum, Kasner's great-niece, speculates the coinage may have been inspired by a comic-strip character, Barney Google, who debuted in 1919. She thinks Kasner, who she says liked cartoons, may have tweaked the spelling to avoid any trademark issues - which would mean the name has come full circle."
Caroline Birenbaum is also quoted saying that "Milton and [her father] Edwin worked for their father's business in Brooklyn, grinding apricot pits into an abrasive for industrial purposes�"
I doubt Barney Google was Milton Sirotta�s inspiration. Not insignificant is that the name GOOGOL was coined "close to 1920" while Barney Google cartoon character debuted in 1919 and was not initially a children�s comic strip. But let me ask our Eastern European readers, what does the process of grinding yellow apricot pits (Sirota�s family business) remains you off? Eureka, of course, Gogol Mogol as they pronounced it in Russia or Gugel Mugel as they used to say in Ukraine and Poland. What is Gogol Mogol? To the rescue are the archives of the Mendele: Yiddish literature and language email list. There is a long and fascinating discussion.
Izaly Zemtsovsky of Berkeley, CA writes:
Subject: Guggle-muggle
My family (from Belorussian Jewry, exactly Nevel of Vitebsk region) knows this name as "Gogol-mogol". The main word is "gogol" (like the last name of well-known Russian-Ukrainian writer, by the way) and second one is just a senseless paired rhyme to this word -- like in numerous children's verses and singing games. One has to check this paired word -- just in case -- in the famous Russian dictionary compiled by Vladimir Dal (unfortunately, this valuable book is not on my desk for the moment). The word might be even onomatopoeic. I never heard "guggle-muggle" but this sounds to me onomatopoeic as well. However, let us double check.
Apropos, I myself used to prepare this delicious both remedy and delicacy in my childhood taking two yolks and energetically stirring them up with two table spoons of sugar -- as long as the mass becomes almost white and dense. Enjoy without getting ill!
Now you can imagine how Milton Sirota might have come up with the Googol. And the rest is history as they say. Keep on searching!
berl, crown heights (commenting to the mentalblog.com: R. Goldshmidt is banned from Moscow post): Regarding "Alter Rebbe's stance vis-�-vis Napoleon. It does not provide a LIMUD of any sort regarding what his attitude might have been toward a benevolent democracy like the United States. Napoleon's intentions regarding the Jews were not simply to grant them freedoms; there were many indications he actively sought to assimilate them (and in such a case one has to prefer a life of misery under an evil regime that will, at least, not attempt to woo the Jews away from Teiroh)... it is most definitely not true that one would see Bonaparte & John Adams in the same light!"
faruq: Sichos in English has the following: "The Alter Rebbe, however, supported Czar Alexander I, explaining that Napoleon's victory would no doubt improve the Jews' economic and social standing, but would detract from their spiritual commitment and practice. A Russian victory, by contrast, would perpetuate the difficult economic conditions under which the Jews lived, but would also nurture the fruitful spiritual climate of yiras shamayim ... which then prevailed."
berl, crown heights: why not continue your quote: "Why was the Alter Rebbe so opposed to Napoleon? At the core of the French Revolution lay a disregard for higher authority, a disregard which can spur undue self-concern. Such an attitude in turn leads to the pursuit of material pleasure and sensual gratification." [24 Teves, 5752] Can the same statement be made about the American Revolution? A resounding NO! American founding fathers were Deists!
Tzemach Atlas: These are the questions that troubled me for many years and I never had a chance to think them through in depth:
Both American and French revolutions were Masonic revolts. Considering the fact that Napoleon himself was a Mason, it seams to be inaccurate to view French enlightenment and specifically Napoleon himself as anti�deist or that different from his Masonic brothers, the American founding fathers.
The only facts that we specially know about Napoleon stance visa-a-vi Jews is that he abolished ghettos, (see Napoleon and the Jews) an inquisitional legacy in the catholic countries, and sough to integrate Jews in the society. Napoleon didn't want to convert Jews; he wanted to give Jews equal rights in this he was in agreement with the American founding fathers.
Interesting that all the fascists and communist: Stalin Hitler, Mussolini, etc. persecuted masons. What if Napoleon was successful in establishing Masonic messianic goal of "Novus Ordo Seclorum" in Europe? It is reasonable to believe that the cataclysms of the century after Napoleon�s passing would have been prevented. The statistical response to the question would have the Jews lost as many souls to the assimilation as they did to WWI, WWII, communism, fascism and yes the massive overwhelming assimilation in Russia itself, the answer is not in doubt.
In light of the quote from the Sicho delivered on 24 Teves, 5752 on Alter Rebbe�s Yehrzeit it is significant to mentioned the �Nefesh Hashfelo� or a transcription of Alter Rebbe�s words right before his passing while he was in Haditch, Russia during his flight from the advancing Napoleon�s army. I have been obsessing about the Kotzker aspects of Chasidism and when I think about Alter Rebbe�s words I shudder. Alter Rebbe brings a Medrash about the creation of the world (from memory): �Emes, the Truth argues against the creation of the universe. Sheker, the Falsehoods comes forth and in a dramatic fashion casts the truth to the ground enabling the world to be created�. I find the fact that Alter Rebbe said this before his passing and specifically during his flight from Napoleon not insignificant!
Long Live "Novus Ordo Seclorum"!
Yirmy, this was not only reported on "chadrey charadim" but on JTA as well. I called Moscow and allegedly there is little know beyond of what is currently published. My source in Moscow is puzzled by the developments. The original version that Slutsker was settling his scores with Goldshmidt is problematic because he has been replaced in his RJC role by Kantor. Members of RJC like Michael Freidman of Alpha Bank, a number two oligarch in Russia, must have a high level connections in the government and should be interested in reinstating the visa for Goldshmidt. The fact that they were not able to do so points to a very high level government official who is behind the ban.
There have been no traces of this affair linked back to R. Berl Lazar yet allegedly R. Lazar has not taken a position. It appears that considering his stature as an official Chief Rabbi of Russia he must have an opinion on the banning of the Chief Rabbi of Moscow. I called Boruch Gorin, Lazar�s spokesman and was told that Boruch is traveling. If any of the readers see R. Lazar or Gorin in Crown Heights this weekend for Kinus HaShluchim please ask them to comment. Let us know what you find out. We will be watching this story.
Boston has the highest cost of living in USA. Housing market in Boston is very limited. There are some larger mansions or condos but a shortage of even expensive smaller homes suitable for Jewish families. As result of this real estate phenomenon even ultra expensive Newton has attracted more Jews compared to Brookline for example. Sharon, MA has grown. Consider poor Jewish schools and cold New England waspy community and you understand why many traditional Jews have abandoned Boston. Just now Dr. Oster featured on this blog announced that he is leaving for good. There is a long list of solid families that preceded his flight.
Amongst the people who are still staying, there are mostly static individuals who have what I call "a real estate condition". I.e. people who are inert by nature, inherited a house or bought it in the 60-70, some bought houses through a chance trickery. The stifling tendency of these renters and "owners" is in evidence amongst the Anash of Brighton and beyond. This became apparent when we tried to build a new shule. Some of the representatives of the group spent a lifetime complaining that nothing is being done around here but when presented with a possibility for change they get sea sick.
And it finally dawned on me what a wonderful place is our little shule. One MIT kid taught me an expression "inverse proportion". He used to say that "girls are beautiful in the inverse proportion to the center of the MIT campus�" Eureka, let me explain.
Imagine there would be a place in the world where you can become what you can�t be in real life. Say you dream of being an artist but you are color blind. See in your mind's eye a place where you can become an artist once a week if you wanted too. Wow! It�s like all powerful Edgar Hoover dressing up as fragile girl once a week. Magic!
So is out little shule, it is in inverse proportion to the strengths of the people. A shy person who is quite and reserved insists on making all the announcements. A person who has a hard time managing his lunch box is adamant about being on all the boards. A person who can�t hold a tune if you put a gun to his head insists on starting every nigun. An obedient husband becomes a General in charge of an army. A spiritual constipate becomes the well of knowledge. A person for whom coherent communication is a Himalayan Mountain feels like Walter Cronkite for a fleeting moment never mind that for others this moment feels like an eternity. A person whose business achievement in the "real world" is blaming the other party becomes a top executive Donald Trump. What a great magical garden. Yes inverse life is indeed possible, even for a miraculous day a week. Boruch Hashem.
My dear dear daughter: I'm so sorry that you had a very difficult experience today, with people you trust, people in authority at the yeshiva, mistreated you today. Read the rest of the letter at Mystical Paths.

All of the above mentioned fundamental conditions existed before and during the administration of the Lubavitcher Rebbe. His inability to even slightly dent the curses of the exile renders his legacy as a spectacular failure. He would not be first though.
Dispel Fantasies commenting to the The Lyricist Sholom Keller post:
All I can say is that Sicho was clearly in the opposite tone of the other Sichos in those months and the crux point was: despite the attempts to make the redemption materialize and this happened? I believe that they played the sicho right after the Rebbe said it, and afterwards (I believe even that night) no zecher of it!
berl, crown heights: Dispel, you are correct about that sicho. It also made waives outside of Lubavitch. And, speaking of 'blog connections', here is one for you: later that year (I think in was in the fall of '92) we spent a Shabbos at the Homowack (I know - yuck!) where I met a young Torah VeDaas guy who said Yudel Keller was his uncle(?). Nice smart guy. We got to talking, wives too. The conversation turned to Lubavitch and Moshiach. And to the Rebbe's stroke. And then the guy actually told me he thought the stroke might have been a punishment for what the Rebbe said in the 'LaPine sicho�...
Shoshanna Silcove writes:
I knew Pesha Lea (OBM). Pesha Lea was a nice, verify normal BT American girl from the South who married a school teacher, had many kids, and live in CH. She was sweet, unassuming, sincere, and made sacrifices to live in CH, saying that she missed living in the tree lined suburbs she was used to, but felt it was important that her children be near the Rebbe. The LaPine's lived very modestly, and Pesha Lea worked part time outside the home, and often spoke about the difficulties in keeping up with her very active brood of children.
The shock of her horrific murder was compounded by several factors: the killer had been going around for a few days prior asking other women if they needed any work done in their houses. One woman said that on the day of the murder that she had informed the CH Community Council security people that she thought this guy may have been suspicious but that they did nothing about it. She bemoaned this saying that she felt Pesha Lea could have been saved if the security people had acted, she knew she could have identified the killer to the police easily.
Also, Pesha Lea was dropped off during the day in front of her house by a neighbor with grocery packages. The killer somehow slipped in while she was taking the packages in from her front step. Her two year old was there and witnessed the entire bloody assualt and murder.
Pesha Lea was married to a Kohain. She fought off her killer's advances that would have rendered her halachically impure to her husband forever, and this resistance could have very well enraged the killer further. She struggled intensely. If she had remained passive, if she had given in, she may have in fact lived. The murder was grisly, bloody, and brutal. She suffered while her baby watched.
After the murder, the community reaction consisted of:The fact that the Rebbe alluded to Pesha Lea's greatness in that sicha should have taught us all that in this world of falseness, we can never judge a Yid's true stature. While there are many people who receive kovod, they may or may not be the one's who reach the highest levels in avoda. Pesha Lea's acts of self sacrifice should have made us all realize that a Yid's value or greatness cannot be judged by externalialities like yichus, money, or Torah learning.
Schneur Zalman of NY comments:
I find it tedious to read the constant stream of complaints coming from BT's . And as such I just skim through these comments. I will just add that the following comments are not directed against individual Baal Teshuvoth, or do they minimize the pain these people feel they suffer. Everyone has their problems. Frum people have their problems too. How did it feel to be mocked by other Jews because we wore Kippoth. Some of these kids years later decided to be come BT's too when Judaism became hip. We spoke Yiddish, not only did the non-Orthodox laugh at us, but even the orthodox called this un-American.
Did you guys ever experience being called dirty Jews because we wore Kippoth as kids? How did it feel never having pizza or eating out? Yes no pizza or other kosher junk food. How did feel to either attend public school or go away miles from your parents� home to a Jewish school?
How did we children of Holocaust survivors cope without extended families with open wounds festering less than 10 years after the conclusion of the War. In many cases of these communities the Germans were so to speak the shadchanim and I won't bother to explain. And our American Jewish neighbors had large extended families always visiting, etc.
How did we feel when our parents could not speak English or teach us about American culture. We overcame these issues and did our best. I believe most Baale teshuva are not complainers, but others complain. Why?? Probably for the same reason they became frum to begin with, the need for attention and the desire for total creature comfort. Many will never be happy.
No one is forcing the BT Jews to be frum. Many would probably be better people if they returned to the Messora of their grandparents of eating Chinese on Sundays and the GoodBye Columbus lifestyle. They could do their Gottesdienst at the local Reform Temple too. Others would benefit from a strong dose of Modern orthodoxy or a close relative of mine calls it "take it easy Judasim". Certainly a transition period of MO Judaism between the 2 extremes would be very beneficial. Still others may realize that Judaism calls for sacrifice its called "Ol malchus Shomayim " its a yoke not a vacation. The texts never promised anyone anything except for a hard time with its spiritual rewards.
Sam Szaposhnik commenting to the The Lyricist Sholom Keller post:
To all the folks closely analyzing Spc. Keller's level of religious practice: If you were running a Chabad House/Kiruv center, and someone like this comes your way, would you judge him and analyze his attitude to frumkeit in this manner and proceed to exploit his parents perceived eccentricities; or would you project feelings of nonjudgmental Ahavas Yisroel?
One would think that persons who had the benefit of a Lubavitch education at some point in their lives, would express the appropriate sensibilities instead of this "klein-kepeldick" self righteous "misnado-centric" diatribe that results from ignorance induced arrogance. Let's remember the words of the Tanna "do not judge you fellow until you in his place"... Perhaps these blog posts can serve as an opportunity for us to reevaluate our own perspectives, so that we find the ability to make every Yid comfortable... Thanks again to Reb Tzemach and Specialist Keller.